|
|
|
|||
|
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee alleges that the West Bengal government backtracked from what they had promised in the accord on Singur land row
Remaining firm on her stand, Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee on Tuesday said the ruling Left Front government in West Bengal had rejected the agreement on Singur land row signed in the presence of governor Gopalkrishna Gandhi.
"The agreement was signed between the state government and the Krishijami Jiban Jibika Raksha Committee (the Trinamool Congress-led farmers organisation) at Raj Bhavan on September 7," Banerjee told a public gathering in front of Tata Motors Nano plant at Singur - about an hour's drive from Kolkata.
"A decision was taken at the meeting that a four-member committee would be formed to settle the land dispute. But within five days of the agreement, the state government broke the committee," she said.
"We joined the meeting as the governor himself took the initiative. Otherwise, we had no faith in the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M)-led state government. In the meeting, the government gave an assurance to give back maximum acres inside the Nano project area. Later they backtracked from what they had promised in the agreement."
"Last week the state government also announced a package for the farmers in Singur without consulting anything with us," Banerjee said, adding that Trinamool does not support the newly-announced package for those who lost their land.
"We want ''land for land''. The state government has only agreed to give back 70 acres inside the Tata Motors'' small car factory site. Our people had already identified about 300 acres inside the factory premises and the remaining 100 acres adjacent to the Nano project area. But the government didn''t pay any heed to that," the Trinamool chief said, reading out the copy of the agreement in public. POLITICAL ARTICLES
|
|
| Click here to get ad specs and place your ad or Click here to contact the advertisement department |
Send Letters to the Editor |